I thought Citizenfour was quite powerful as a humanizing portrayal of Snowden. I didn\u2019t learn anything new particularly about NSA programs, since I\u2019ve been reading each story I come across, but the film quite effectively transported me into Snowden\u2019s hotel room in Hong Kong and into conversations with Snowden, Greenwald, Poitras and MacAskill. Snowden comes off as a completely responsible, quite sincere, thoughtful young man. He very clearly and explicitly says that he does not want to be the story, and one believes him. Whereas Assange can impress people as narcissistic and Bradley\/Chelsea Manning\u2019s sexual confusion was only one of a number of facets which distracted from Cablegate, Snowden sounds like a young Ellsberg \u2013 very intelligent and well-spoken.<\/p>\n
Poitras\u2019s style was interesting, I thought. The camera a number of times holds for lengthy periods on fairly static shots of architecture, which served to impress the viewer with the monolithic, pervasive nature of the NSA\u2019s networks. There\u2019s a long disorienting shot out the window of a train at night or going through a tunnel, which draws you into the dark network Snowden\u2019s revealing.<\/p>\n
The film successfully touches on a number of different aspects of the surveillance state, bringing in the idea that when we talk about \u201cprivacy\u201d we\u2019re talking about security, about our constitutional right to freedom from unlawful search and seizure. I think this is a hard sell for too many viewers. I don\u2019t fault the film here. I saw it with a friend who was a few minutes late because she was watching the Giants\u2019 game. In discussing the movie afterwards she questioned just how important some of the issues raised were. Greenwald and others speak passionately about the dangers of the surveillance state, but my date pointed out that she can\u2019t feel much fear that the NSA is going to be breaking down her door because of anything she\u2019s said on the phone or in e-mail. My own experience is that friends and colleagues on the one hand self-censor, and don\u2019t mention politics, drugs, Bittorrent use, etc. in e-mail or social media for fear of the all-knowing eye, or on the other hand seem oblivious to any danger \u2013 why worry about Google programmatically reading every single e-mail sent or received, if it means free e-mail and potentially more accurate search results when shopping?<\/p>\n
Snowden at one point convincingly says he doesn\u2019t think it is possible for anyone no matter how brilliant and educated to individually fight all the electronic surveillance systems in existence. We\u2019re told of the multitude of methods of surveillance and repeatedly shown NSA officials blatantly lying to Congress about their existence. The lack of accountability for this last has been personally troubling to me \u2013 I remember Watergate and Iran-Contra \u2013 how is it that the heads of the NSA can with impunity flat out lie to Congress about spying on American citizens? What will viewers come away with when walking out of the theater after Citizenfour? I\u2019m wondering how many will see it as a call to action, and how many as a well-executed depiction of Edward Snowden\u2019s experience, which may not be seen as intersecting our own.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I thought Citizenfour was quite powerful as a humanizing portrayal of Snowden. I didn\u2019t learn anything new particularly about NSA programs, since I\u2019ve been reading each story I come across, but the film quite effectively transported me into Snowden\u2019s hotel … Weiterlesen